[cfp-interest 3619] Re: Quiet/Signaling NaNs

[Damian McGuckin]

On Tue, 23 Sep 2025, Jim Thomas wrote:

> I agree with adding ?both quiet and signaling? as suggested.

Thanks.

> Normally Annex F does not specify behavior involving signaling NaNs. 
> However, the optional support for signaling NaNs in F.2.2 only includes 
> raising ?invalid? and doesn?t apply to signbit.

Yes.

Thanks - Damian