[cfp-interest 3468] frexp() in Annex F
Damian McGuckin
damianm at esi.com.au
Sun May 25 21:38:37 PDT 2025
Currently, the special cases of frexp() are explained using a sentence
constructed as.
frexp(...) returns RESULT, and stores THING
frexp(...) stores THING (and returns RESULT)
What is the point of
a) the comma in the first case, and
b) parenthesising the result (where the input in NaN).
Comments please?
In a desire for consistency, should these say
returns RESULT and stores THING
OR
stores THING and returns RESULT
Thanks - Damian
More information about the cfp-interest
mailing list