[cfp-interest 3443] Re: (no subject)

[RAJAN BHAKTA]

I am in favor of making that change. It can be an optional part of this proposal, or a separate one (I prefer the former).

Regards,

Rajan Bhakta


From: cfp-interest <cfp-interest-bounces at oakapple.net> on behalf of Damian McGuckin <damianm at esi.com.au>
Date: Thursday, April 17, 2025 at 6:04 AM
To: CFP Interest <cfp-interest at oakapple.net>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cfp-interest 3442] (no subject)

Given the proposed change to 7.3.1 where we now talk about return types,,
consider 7.12.1 General (within Mathematics <math.h> which currently says:

         The header <math.h> declares two types and many mathematical
         functions and defines several macros. Most synopses specify a
         family of functions consisting of a principal function with one or
         more double parameters, a double return value, or both; and other
         functions with the same name but with f and l suffixes, which are
         corresponding functions with float and long double parameters,
         return values, or both. 268)

Should the use of return values change to return types?

Thanks - Damian
_______________________________________________
cfp-interest mailing list
cfp-interest at oakapple.net
http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20250417/6e108250/attachment.htm>