[Cfp-interest 3286] Re: Specification of complex operators

[Fred J. Tydeman]

On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 16:29:33 -0700 Jim Thomas wrote:
>
>Following up on the action item
>>>  Jim: Update Complex suggestions (3262) for Annex G migration.
>>> 
>here is an update. Despite CFP meeting comments, I retained the use of "computes" (at least for now) because it seems 
>consistent enough with other use in C, notably in F.10.11.1.
>
>https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/C2Y proposal - complex operators-20240921.pdf 
><https://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/C2Y%20proposal%20-%20%20complex%20operators-20240921.p

Looks much better.  Aside:  some of the 'u' have an underscore.


---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093      Vice-chair of INCITS/C (ANSI "C")
Sample C17+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.