[Cfp-interest 3263] Re: Specification of complex operators

[Damian McGuckin]

I agree 100% that such words need to be said.

So I took the words from around those locations and then merged the new 
words into a document and the new words look totally out of place. And
they overly complicate 6.2.5 and 6.5.6 and 6.5.7.

I believe this sort of stuff needs to stay in Annex G.  That way people 
who have no need to think about complex types do not have to be confused.

That said, the concept of a "complex infinity" is referenced in 7.3.9.5 
but not defined until G.2. I would suggest that G.2 be moved into the 
start 7.3, i.e. 7.3.1.

Or maybe 7.3 needs to move to Annex G.

Thanks - Damian

Pacific Engineering Systems International ..... 20D Grose St, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here
Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer