[Cfp-interest 3299] Re: WG14 CFP papers results part 2

[RAJAN BHAKTA]

Final CFP paper summary:

N3364 - Give consistent wording for SNAN initialization:
  Straw poll: Put N3364 alternative 1 in C2Y?
    13/0/5. Passes.

Regards,

Rajan Bhakta


From: Cfp-interest <cfp-interest-bounces at oakapple.net> on behalf of RAJAN BHAKTA <rbhakta at us.ibm.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 at 11:52 AM
To: cfp-interest at oakapple.net <cfp-interest at oakapple.net>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Cfp-interest 3295] WG14 CFP papers results part 2
Here is the summary of the results for the next set of CFP papers. In essence, all got in pretty solidly. N3291 - Proposal for C2Y - Decimal floating-point number—misuse of term: Robert wants "followed by" instead of "then"

Here is the summary of the results for the next set of CFP papers. In essence, all got in pretty solidly.

N3291 - Proposal for C2Y - Decimal floating-point number—misuse of term:
  Robert wants "followed by" instead of "then" (in the original text).

  Straw poll: Put N3291 in C2Y with having the editor look at the word “then”?
    18/0/3. Consensus.

N3303 - Proposal for C2Y - missing HUGE_VAL suffixes
  Straw poll: Put N3303 in C2Y?
    18/0/2. Consensus.

N3305 - Proposal for C2Y - leftover dependency on WANT macro
  Straw poll: Put N3305 in C2Y?
    17/0/3. Consensus.

  Straw poll: Put N3305 in the retroactive list on the WG14 website?
    13/0/7. Consensus.

N3324 - C2Y proposal - wording for pole error
  Straw poll: Put N3324 in C2Y?
    14/0/7. Consensus.

Regards,

Rajan Bhakta

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20241003/ff092f5c/attachment.htm>