[Cfp-interest 3231] Re: Various Updates to Annex F+G

[Jim Thomas]

Damian,

I believe the parts “For Consistency Between F+G” need to be reviewed together. 

But you might consider separating out other parts. That way CFP could have agenda slots for focused discussion of the separate parts. 

Keeping it all together (as is) should suffice for getting an initial round of review and comments from CFP. Then we could have an agenda slot to start through comments.

Your choice.

- Jim Thomas



> On Aug 18, 2024, at 8:16 AM, Damian McGuckin <damianm at esi.com.au> wrote:
> 
> 
> Is this set of updates to Annex F and G preliminaries small enough?
> 
> Thanks - Damian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: c26-afg-mods-intro-01.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 52067 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20240820/7b4a9ad1/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------