[Cfp-interest 2600] Re: draft CFP response for NB comments and N3071

[Fred J. Tydeman]

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 12:10:25 -0800 Jim Thomas wrote:
>
>Please review the paper and send any corrections or additions ASAP.

Do the examples that involve "0.1" also depend upon FLT_EVAL_METHOD?
If long double has more precision than double, 
constexpr double d = 0.1;  
would have a change in value if FLT_EVAL_METHOD were 2.
But,
constexpr double d = (double)0.1;  
would always be safe.

It might help to add to your examples:
constexpr double _Complex dc1 = DBL_SNAN; // ok???
constexpr double _Complex dc2 = CMPLX(DBL_SNAN, 0.);  // ok
constexpr double _Complex dc3 = CMPLX(0., DBL_SNAN); // ok




---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093      Vice-chair of INCITS/C (ANSI "C")
Sample C17+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.