[Cfp-interest 2536] Fwd: Editorial review

[Jim Thomas]

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Jim Thomas <jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: Editorial review
> Date: August 15, 2022 at 1:48:01 PM PDT
> To: David Keaton <dmk at dmk.com>
> Cc: Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>, Rajan Bhakta <rbhakta at us.ibm.com>, Alex Gilding <agilding at perforce.com>, Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt at inria.fr>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery.com>, Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis at gmail.com>, Robert Seacord <rcseacord at gmail.com>, "Fred J. Tydeman" <tydeman at tybor.com>, JeanHeyd Meneide <phdofthehouse at gmail.com>, Freek Wiedijk <freek at cs.ru.nl>
> 
> Attached are comments from CFP reviewers for the C23 review draft N3047 (August 4).
> 
> - Jim Thomas
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 4, 2022, at 4:47 PM, David Keaton <dmk at dmk.com> wrote:
>> 
>>    Thanks to everyone who volunteered to serve as editorial reviewers for the draft C standard before it is sent for CD ballot.  I've attached the latest draft of the standard and the editor's report.
>> 
>>    I've appended "_draft" to the filenames because there is a chance they will get new document numbers, but they will probably end up with the ones in the filenames.  In any case, these are the files to review.
>> 
>>    The primary purpose is to find out if the most recent changes to the draft match the documents that were voted into the standard.  If you happen to notice anything editorial that needs correcting while looking at that, please do mention it.  However making sure the draft matches the papers that were voted in takes priority.
>> 
>>    While doing this, if you notice any other non-editorial errors, feel free to report them.  Depending on what they are, we might send another cycle through WG 14, or we might want them to be addressed with NB comments.  However, again, making sure the draft matches the voted-in papers is more important.  There will be plenty of time to review other things during the CD ballot.
>> 
>>    Thanks again for volunteering.  I would appreciate it if you would have all your comments in by the end of Monday, August 15, after which there will be some editing time, and then the CD ballot.
>> 
>> 					David<n3047_draft.pdf><n3048_draft.html>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20220815/ea49a279/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CFP comments on N3047-for WG14-20220815.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 175813 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20220815/ea49a279/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20220815/ea49a279/attachment-0003.htm>