[Cfp-interest 2503] DFP < imaginary
Fred J. Tydeman
tydeman at tybor.com
Thu Aug 4 18:08:50 PDT 2022
What is the reason that
DFP < imaginary
is valid, while
DFP + imaginary
is a constraint violation?
Is page 85, 6.5.8 Relational operators, #3
missing:
"complex type, or imaginary type."
---
Fred J. Tydeman Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093 Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.
More information about the Cfp-interest
mailing list