[Cfp-interest 2503] DFP < imaginary

Fred J. Tydeman tydeman at tybor.com
Thu Aug 4 18:08:50 PDT 2022


What is the reason that
  DFP  < imaginary
is valid, while
  DFP + imaginary 
is a constraint violation?

Is page 85, 6.5.8  Relational operators, #3
missing:
"complex type, or imaginary type."

---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093      Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.



More information about the Cfp-interest mailing list