[Cfp-interest 1910] Another test - ignore

Fri Jan 29 00:58:49 PST 2021

This is in the body of the email (not an attachment).

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">

<html>
<head>
  <meta name="generator" content=
  "HTML Tidy for OS/2 (vers 1 September 2005), see www.w3.org">
<style type="text/css">
      del { font-weight:bold;background-color:#ffa0a0 }
      ins { font-weight:bold;background-color:#a0ffa0 }
      blockquote {
      display: block;
      font-family: "Times New Roman";
      background-color:lightgray;
      margin-top: 1em;
      margin-bottom: 1em;
      margin-left: 40px;
      margin-right: 40px
      }
</style>

  <title>N2641: Missing +(x) in table</title>
</head>

<body>
  <p><br>
  <!-- Who are the authors... -->
   <b>Submitter:</b>CFP group<br>
  <!-- What is the date of submission. yyyy-mm-dd -->
   <b>Submission Date:</b> 2021-01-24<br>
  <b>Document:</b> WG14 N2641<br>
  <b>Title:</b> N2641: Missing +(x) in table<br>
  <b>Reference Documents:</b> N2596</p>

  <p>Summary: +(x) is similar to -(x) for certain properties, so
  should be added to a table. This should be considered an editoral
  change.</p>

  <p>The binding table in Annex F.3 identifies unary + as a 754
  copy operation which preserves the representation, and hence the
  quantum exponent, of the operand. Therefore, +(x) should be added
  to the line with -(x) in the preferred quantum exponents
  table.</p>

  <p>In the Preferred quantum exponents table in paragraph 10 of
  5.2.4.2.3, change</p>

  <blockquote>
    -(x)
  </blockquote>to

  <blockquote>
    -(x)<ins>, +(x)</ins>
  </blockquote>
</body>
</html>

---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093      Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.