[Cfp-interest 1978] Re: ties to away
Damian McGuckin
damianm at esi.com.au
Wed Apr 14 22:53:33 PDT 2021
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Paul Zimmermann wrote:
> while looking for the support of the roundTiesToAway IEEE 754-2019
> rounding attribute in n2596.pdf, I noticed on page 440 in the bottom
> table there is "roundToIntegralTiesAway" whereas all other occurrences
> are "...TiesToAway" (for example in the table pages 441-442, pages 443,
> 444, ...), and also page 440 it is "roundToIntegralTiesToEven".
>
> Should "roundToIntegralTiesAway" on page 440 be replaced by
> "roundToIntegralTiesToAway"?
Yes. Eagle eyes.
Sadly, somewhere between 1985 and 2008 the English got corrupted.
When the committee added the concepts of
cases rounded away from zero
case rounded to even
there was an extra preposition added in front of 'away' when the names
used in the IEEE standard were chosen. And we are stuck with it.
It must have been done by the same group of people who say 'rate of speed'
when they just mean 'speed' (and not the acceleration which is the exact
meaning of rate of speed) and 'straight-away' when they mean 'straight'.
Regards - Damian
Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here
Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
More information about the Cfp-interest
mailing list