[Cfp-interest 1821] Re: Preferred quantum exponent of +(x)
Jim Thomas
jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net
Sat Oct 24 14:09:14 PDT 2020
Yes, it should be in the table. The binding table in Annex F identifies unary + as a 754 copy operation which preserves the representation, and hence the quantum exponent, of the operand.
- Jim Thomas
> On Oct 24, 2020, at 8:08 AM, Fred J. Tydeman <tydeman at tybor.com> wrote:
>
> Should "+(x)" be added to the "-(x)" line in the preferred quantum exponents
> table in 5.2.4.2.3?
>
> ---
> Fred J. Tydeman Tydeman Consulting
> tydeman at tybor.com Testing, numerics, programming
> +1 (702) 608-6093 Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
> Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
> Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cfp-interest mailing list
> Cfp-interest at oakapple.net
> http://mailman.oakapple.net/mailman/listinfo/cfp-interest
More information about the Cfp-interest
mailing list