[Cfp-interest 1614] Re: TS3 annex review

[Fred J. Tydeman]

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 09:47:36 -0700 Jim Thomas wrote:
>
>> Page 12, line 14:  Would it be better to replace (in C2X) "_Decimal32,
>> _Decimal64,  _Decimal128" with "_DecimalN, where N is multiple of 32".
>
>Why? Only 32, 64, and 128 pertain.

With the change you have, we end up with 4 lines in 6.7.2:
_Decimal32
_Decimal64
_Decimal128
_DecimalN, where N is 96 or > 128 and a multiple of 32

WIth the change I suggest, we end up with one line
_DecimalN, where N is multiple of 32


---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093      Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.