[Cfp-interest 1355] Re: AI about why a second name from log1p

[Mike Cowlishaw]

I'd suggest 'identical' rather than 'equivalent' [if that is true].
'Equivalent' is often used to suggest "this will give the same results if
given the correct parameters", etc.
 
Mike


  _____  

From: cfp-interest-bounces at oakapple.net
[mailto:cfp-interest-bounces at oakapple.net] On Behalf Of Jim Thomas
Sent: 19 July 2019 18:45
To: CFP
Subject: [Cfp-interest 1354] AI about why a second name from log1p


Action item: 

    Jim: Add a statement as to why there is a second name for log1p as a
footnote as a new proposal.
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->


Below is a draft proposal. The C2X draft with TS4a is not yet an N-doc, so
our proposal can't suitably reference it yet. Please go ahead and let me
know if you have suggestions for the (short) proposal. Then when the C2X
draft gets a number, I insert the number into our proposal, and send it
(incorporating any input from you) to WG14.

- Jim Thomas

http://wiki.edg.com/pub/CFP/WebHome/C2x_proposal_-_why_logp1-20190719.pdf

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20190719/ddc2ece1/attachment-0001.html