[Cfp-interest 1297] N2320

Fred J. Tydeman tydeman at tybor.com
Sun Apr 28 00:58:34 PDT 2019


On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 10:08:28 -0700 Jim Thomas wrote:
>
>> N2320<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2320.htm> 2018/12/10 Tydeman, Precision and NAN/NAN(...) and INF/INFINITY
>
>The first scheme seems arbitrary in some respects and might break all existing implementations. The impact could be lessened by allowing either of the infinity or NaN forms when p >= 9. Why require the nan(n-char-sequence) form when the n-char-sequence is not required to have any meaning? 
>

Since the first scheme breaks all existing implementations, I am not pushing it
 (and I assume that WG14 will reject it).  I assume that the second scheme will
be liked by WG14.


---
Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman at tybor.com      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093      Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.



More information about the Cfp-interest mailing list