[Cfp-interest] Not trigger sNaN

[Mike Cowlishaw]

I believe it was, but I do not recall the reasoning.  Eric Schwartz might
remember; cc:ing him ...

Mike 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Thomas [mailto:jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net] 
> Sent: 16 September 2018 16:40
> To: Mike Cowlishaw
> Cc: cfp-interest at oakapple.net
> Subject: Re: [Cfp-interest] Not trigger sNaN
> 
> Mike,
> 
> 754 seems to say sameQuantum(sNaN, qNaN) is true with no 
> exception. Just double checking that it is as intended.
> 
> Jim
> 
> > On Aug 28, 2018, at 7:16 PM, Fred J. Tydeman 
> <tydeman at tybor.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:13:45 -0500 Rajan Bhakta wrote:
> >> 
> >>         *AI*: Fred: See which other functions have the need to not 
> >> trigger signaling nans but are functions (need to be macros).
> > 
> > 754 Operations that shall not trigger an sNaN (signal invalid):
> > 
> > "*" are functions in C
> > 
> > 
> ...
> > sameQuantum() = samequantum()*
> > 
>