[Cfp-interest] Fw: 18661-2 and 754
Jim Thomas
jaswthomas at sbcglobal.net
Wed May 16 08:23:43 PDT 2018
For these operations 754 says "they only affect the sign bit”. Does this make sense for extended formats, given that 754 doesn’t specify their encodings?
> On May 15, 2018, at 3:24 PM, David Hough CFP <pcfp at oakapple.net> wrote:
>
>> Not all IEEE 754 operations guarantee a canonical result, do they? Eg,=0D
> copying, negating, absolute value.
>
> The result is as canonical or non-canonical
> as the input, differing only in the sign bit.
More information about the Cfp-interest
mailing list