[Cfp-interest] Typos

[Rajan Bhakta]

Comments:
  Section 3: Should we say in normative references that IEEE 754-2008 *OR* 
ISO/IEC/IEEE 60559:2011? (because we say the following are indispensable, 
implying the list of documents are all uniquely required)

Typos:

Section 5, Suggested change 1:
__STDC_IEC_60559__ -> __STDC_IEC_559__

7.2 line 2:
All encodings In IEC 60559 -> All encodings in IEC 60559

F.3 point 9, 10 are split when they should be together (and the last 
sentence of 9 is a footnote)
F.3 point 11: isgreater is not in *bold*
F.3 point 12: FE_INEXACT is not in *bold* (seems to apply to the first 
item in any list in parenthesis so later ones will not be listed)

Section 10: p is the precision of the widest support*ed* IEC 60559 binary 
format.

Regards,

Rajan Bhakta
z/OS XL C/C++ Compiler Technical Architect
ISO C Standards Representative for Canada
C Compiler Development
Contact: rbhakta at ca.ibm.com, Rajan Bhakta/Toronto/IBM
Telephone: (905) 413-3995
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.oakapple.net/pipermail/cfp-interest/attachments/20120315/ca5437f1/attachment.html